PRITAM SENGUPTA writes from New Delhi: Saturday afternoons don’t figure highly on the radar screens of TV channels. Because they are all in the “hills” smoking cigars, eating caviar, and calculating how much richer the soaring valuations have made them in the week gone by, channel heads all believe this is the time when the aam janata, after biryani and a glass of beer, are too groggy to pay attention and keep the “People Meters” ticking.
So this is when they sneak in soft not-so-newsy stuff—travel, food, books, letters, automotive, spirituality, gadgets—and other “events” and other stuff designed to keep in the media plans of advertisers.
But the afternoon of Saturday, 1 March 2008, was different. It was the day after the 2008-09 budget had been presented by P. Chidambaram. And it was the afternoon the Union finance minister had decided to give his traditional post-budget interviews to the media after (presumably) a nice Chettinad lunch.
Network 18 with two business channels in its bow—CNBC-TV18 and CNBC-Awaaz—was given first shot.
Its managing director Raghav Bahl was to conduct the pow-wow and all morning, the network’s channels, including CNN-IBN, kept plugging the “First Post-Budget Interview”. It was to begin at 2.50 pm. But, as a sleepy nation waited for PC to explain what he had done, the clock stretched to 3 pm. Finally, it began at 3.15 pm.
Most of Bahl’s initial questions were on the waiver of loans for small and marginal farmers that is said to cost the nation Rs 60,000 crore. Where is he going to find the funds for it, Bahl asked—and asked—and asked. Chidambaram guffawed and gave that trademark “Look-I-went-to-Harvard-how-many-of-you-did” smirk which reporters from North Block to Sivaganga dread.
When Bahl continued to insist on an answer, PC said helpfully: “Look, whatever way you try to get it out of me, I am not going to reveal it on a TV show when Parliament is in session.”
But Bahl wouldn’t give up. And when he asked once more, PC said: “Look you are wasting your time. You might as well squeeze in your other questions.”
When an unrelenting Bahl pushed again, Chidambaram said “That’s it,” got up and walked out of the interview, while Bahl, who uses a walking stick, sat in his chair.
End of interview within three minutes.
Live.
You didn’t see the walkout “live” in your hypogogic haze, did you?
I did.
And the moment I saw it, my mind immediately raced back to Narendra Modi‘s famous walkout from an interview with Karan Thapar last October. That walkout was sparked when Thapar insisted on a “regret” from the Gujarat chief minister for what was allowed to happen in the aftermath of the Godhra train blaze.
First a Modi walkout, then a Chidambaram walkout, that’s yet another CNN-IBN “exclusive”, I thought.
But while the Modi walkout was the meat and drink for the channel and other media for days on end, news of the Chidambaram walkout has been very nearly blacked out. The walkout wasn’t replayed endlessly on CNN-IBN or CNBC in the evening bulletins on Saturday. The walkout didn’t become the “Image of the Day”. And the walkout finds no mention whatsoever in Raghav Bahl’s report of his interview on IBN Live.
So, what gives?
As the home of two business channels, with a Hindi business newspaper coming up, Network 18 cannot obviously afford to rub the finance minister on the wrong side. With a partnership with Forbes coming up, and countless FDI/FII/FCCB deals coming up, Network 18 cannot obviously make an issue of this minor conflagration.
Still, can there be one rule for Modi, and another rule for Chidambaram?
One rule for a chief minister with a past; another rule for a market-friendly finance minister?
One rule for a BJP man, another for a Congress man?
To his credit, Bahl eventually managed to convince Chidambaram to address the nation in his smug, supercilious best once again. So some lost ground was recovered. But as Chidambaram’s “first” interview on Network 18 and his second interview with NDTV aired at more or less the same time, the irony was stark and striking.
Cross-posted on sans serif
Dear All,
Nice column by Pritam Sengupta!
The column proves once and for all the truism Kongas are up to no good. In fact, the moniker konga fits aptly to our thambhis. Witness the letter written by Maran urging the PM to ensure only Tamil remained a ‘classic’ language! Raghav Bahl has earned the gratitude of millions of right thinking Indians by putting the Chettinad Konga in his place. The dhothi retard was hoping that all Indians would be applauding his financial wizardry! Instead the turd was exposed as a ‘420’. I have no respect for Harvard–SM Krishna, Subramaniyan Swamy, Chidambaram–you decide. Thanks.
LikeLike
I did see this “LIVE” walkout by the FM on IBN Live channel. I thought Raghav Bahl was too discourteous in his questions. In spite of the FM repeating 4 – 5 times that he was not bound to answer him on the question, he was repeatedly trying show his prowess in English by rephrasing the same question – which I though was not correct for a journalist. It was like the “Devil’s Advocate” by Karan Thapar.
Yes, we might ask him for answers but if the FM declines to answer saying that he is accountable to parliment, that should be respected – whatever be the case since Parliment is supreme.
I thought it was poor journalism by Raghav. As the author here suggested, they simply covered their back in their further relays by not replaying this scene. Call that intelligent journalism!!
I dare question IBN Live how many times they showed Modi walking out of the interview? Yes, why double standards? Another question of pseudo-secularism or pseudo-favouritism? Rajdeep Sardesai, do you care to answer, eh?
LikeLike
When the interviewee politely and firmly turns down the request to answer the question with valid reasons , shouldn’t the interviewer change his question and carry on with the interview? Or is it some sort of a house-arrest where he is not allowed to move unless and until he answers the interviewer’s question? Why bring in the Modi incident now? And that too with their party tag attached. Why didn’t you say one is a ‘South Indian’ and other is a ‘West Indian’? One is clean shaven and other got a beard. Are they the only people who ever dared to snub a journo in India?
LikeLike
Didn’t they pay him enough!? :P
LikeLike
Aggressive interviewing is welcome and desperately needed because Indian media is floating in a sea of sameness, but the series of interviews the finance minister gives after the budget is not the place to do it.
These “traditional” post-budget interviews are just a public relations exercise where the finance minister shows off what he has done. When the budget session of parliament is on, there is no way he can reveal anything to the media without inviting privilege. Bahl should have known that, but then Bahl is no journalist, at least no longer.
Bahl’s questions are nothing compared to the kind of aggressive line that British interviewers like Jeremy Paxman use. It’s Karan Thapar 10x. If British politicians can go through the wringer, why can’t Chidambaram? Bahl would have been a hero if he had declined to resume and redo the interview. He would have shown Chidambaram for what he is: an arrogant so-and-so who thinks he is beyond scrutiny. But then Bahl is too smart an entrepreneur to let his journalistic ego come in the way of his business.
LikeLike
Buddi….These english news channels are total garbage. They always project BJP as communal forces. Modi is doing very exceptional job in Gujarat and NRI investment is flooding to Gujarat.
Namm Deve Gowdru(Sleeping Man) Karnatakake enu kasina kelsa madilla kalla nan maga. Karnataka people …please kick out Gowda family from state politics and vote for BJP in coming elections.
LikeLike
atleast pc is sophisticated to handle these tv guys unlike our night farmer who abuses and insults the media.I also found that the media in Kannada nadu behaves in a particularly notorious manner covering the mob voilence perpepuated by the rowdy elements of the krv.I never find any anchor or reporter asking kumaraswamy about radhika or questioning the parentage of vinod raj nor probing the wealth looted from the treasuries by the shivakumar’s , krishna’s , gowda’s etc.There seems to be a give and take policy in kannada nadu and that is the reason we find criminals finding more coverage in the local papers.
LikeLike
Chidambaram is one big hypocrite I have seen in my life!! The questions were valid and finance minister should have answered them with ease!
LikeLike
Ree NS Rao!
Chidambara is an elected official and the man announced a BIG right off! The turd was exposed and he was trying to hide behind excuses. That’s all.
LikeLike
As a konga I know what I am speaking about. PC is an arrogant, incompetent, unimaginative, ignorant minister. Neither he nor MMS has achieved anything of significance as an FM. MMS can’t help being a bureaucrat waiting timidly for orders, while PC can’t help being a mercantilist, taking care if his own welfare, the public be damned. Subramaniam Swamy is a first rate intellect, unforunately he makes enemies too easily. Expect the media to lie prostrate before the UPA ‘geniuses’ with a smile on their faces.
LikeLike
The real issue here is – politicians, for some unknown reason, think that they are beyond questioning. It is very much evident in the arrogance of modi or lalu or prakash karat or p chidambaran.
LikeLike
DB,
SMK didnt go to harvard.
And as a person he doesn’t seem to have the superiority complex which the kongas you mentioned have. I saw him treat a lowly tennis ‘marker’ at Bangalore club like a human being. Which most other tennis playing members dont generally do. And generally people who have interacted with him say he treats people decently without much hangups (even Dinakar mentions this in his infamous book on the Veerappan incident).
While his sell out of Bangalore to outsiders and clan members etc. (continuing in the tradition of RK Hegde) is another matter, when it comes to arrogance and assumed airs or intellectual superiority the kongs are in a class of their own.
LikeLike
‘X’ Guy!
One act of random kindness! ? I thought SMK went to Harvard…I agree Kongas can assume all sorts of phony airs. Just look at the letter by Mara to MMS on preventing Kannada becoming another ‘classical’ language:)
LikeLike
Chidambaram has not committed a crime by not answering a question by the media. He can not disclose something to the media first when the parliament is in session. He is only abiding by the rules.
I disagree with NRI. Just because Modi is bringing in a lot of investment does not mean he is good and we should vote for him. If Hitler who committed genocide brought in a lot of investment, would he be considered good?
LikeLike
Chidambaram has not committed a crime by not answering a question by the media. He can not disclose something to the media first when the parliament is in session. He is only abiding by the rules.
I disagree with NRI. Just because Modi is bringing in a lot of investment does not mean he is good and we should vote for him. If Hitler who committed genocide brought in a lot of investment, would he be considered good?
LikeLike
No major biz house in the country can get on the bad books of Indian FM. Remember how TOI handled the incident some time back in Bangalore when TOI photographer pushed and Chidambaram broke his toe outside Koshys? (http://tinyurl.com/yqy4dq) – because Income Tax folks were already lining up outside mansions of TOI honchos even before Chidambaram had reached the hospital!
Same media tries to provoke Modi every other day but have not been harassed by Modi’s people. Imagine the ruckus media will rake up if Modi took any retaliatory measures! But same media does not have guts to take up when Congress or Chidambaram can pull worse stunt off..
LikeLike
@ptc bus..
Please dont compare Modi to Hitler.
If Modi was indeed Hitler, then no one else other than Hindus would have lived in Gujarat.
The media is trying with all its might to paint Modi in black.
Look at the Haren Pandya case.. the High Court itself has asked to remove Modi from the accused list as there was no case against him.
In the Gujarat riots, 1 Hindu died for 2-3 Muslims dead. So you cant call it a genoside.
There is no evidence of Modi being involved in the riots. So it is wrong to compare him to Hitler. Nero would be more correct.
LikeLike
taks: So Modi is a failed Hitler? Since there were no court verdict against Idi Amin, Slobodan Milosevic, Pol Pot, Stalin or Papa Doc we should call Modi a mongrel of all these creatures. Right?
LikeLike
AnonyMys: Idi Amin, Slobodan Milosevic, Pol Pot, Stalin or Papa Doc we should call Modi a mongrel of all these creatures. Right?
I thought in India as well as everywhere in the world, people believed in “Innocent till proven guilty”. The day Modi is found guilty in the court, lets call him whatever we want, till then all of us can request mongrels like you too keep your (rat infested) tongue well inside your mouth.
LikeLike
SMK went to South Methodist University not Harvard.
LikeLike
N-A-W-N
Thank you!
LikeLike
@AnonyMys:
you are way off target dear….
you do not know the difference between modi and imin, pot etc.
modi is democratically elected.
the police did try to disperse mobs,
media did try to nail modi,
courts are now doing their job.
there is no proof yet of modi’s involvement.
please do not behave like the prejudiced, sickular media.
LikeLike
CNN-IBN, NDTV is simpy anti-hindu channel. Management only hires who spew anti hindu venom
LikeLike