‘A steady escalation of tit-for-tat chauvinism’

The Hindu in an editorial today on the Hogenakal row:

“The key fact is that the two States reached an agreement in 1998 that they would not oppose each other’s drinking water schemes. The reasoning was that as long as each State was utilising water only from its share of the Cauvery water as determined by the tribunal in its interim award, the other could have no cause for complaint. Tamil Nadu withdrew its objections to the diversion of Cauvery water for the Bangalore drinking water supply scheme on the understanding that Karnataka would not oppose the Hogenakal drinking water project. The central government subsequently cleared the Hogenakal project to everybody’s satisfaction. But all this is now being obscured in a steady escalation of tit-for-tat chauvinism.”

Read the full editorial: Unsettling a settled issue