NIKHIL MORO writes from Atlanta: As if in response to Sreelatha Menon‘s Business Standard report that Indian billionaires are stingy, comes this story in Star of Mysore: “50,000 schools to be handed over to Azim Premji Foundation.”
The story, assuming it is accurate, disturbed me almost into hysteria. Not because I am against private or charitable participation in education, but because any such decision— even if involving Premji’s noble charity—must be preceded by careful debate.
Karnataka has sprung on us this jack-in-a-box without discussion in the legislature or outside.
Whatever happened to democratic courtesies?
Besides, the state’s jettisoning its duty to elementary education reveals a deep incompetence—or an incredible arrogance.
I can barely believe that governance has to come to such a pass in the 60th year of independence that our state won’t manage a basic education for our youngest and most vulnerable citizens. Our politicians must, as a community, hang their heads in shame.
It seems like our chief minister is inept; he must make way for someone who can deliver better. His doing so would, of course, be no reflection on the charitable zeal of the Azim Premji Foundation. A karmic explanation of Sri. Premji’s being so incredibly wealthy—he made Rs. 580 crore in 2006-07 just from holding 82 per cent of Wipro’s stock—might be that he is not just a terrific businessman but also a humanist.
Even in market-reformed societies where the notion of natural liberty is better evolved than it is in India, there is consensus that government cannot divest itself of the three basic duties prescribed by the 18th century Scottish economist Adam Smith: Providing security, justice, and public institutions.
Our elementary schools are our most visible public institutions—a grand theme of the state’s support to manifest the “perfection already in man,” to quote Swami Vivekananda‘s view of education.
In 1989, my headmaster at Sri Ramakrishna Vidyashala, the redoubtable B.S. Srikantiah, once exclaimed about the Vontikoppal government school visible from our terrace: “See that school? Raja Ramanna went there.”
That school’s kids—soiled uniforms, no footwear—were immersed in a raucous game of soorchi using a deflated tennis ball; their building had gaping holes in its roof where Mangalooru tiles should have been. We felt privileged: Sri. Srikantiah had succeeded in piling on us a ton of expectation!
Even well-oiled market economies such as the United States manage vast if inefficient systems of public education. We need to adequately debate why Karnataka should not. Meanwhile, the courts must be asked to scrutinize the legality of the government’s momentous decision.
Related link: Educationists oppose Karnataka move
nikhil,
what exactly is in the initiative that got your goat?
what does handing over 50,000 schools mean?
what is premji’s mandate in managing these schools?
is the fee structure altered? is the subject matter altered?
is enrollment pattern altered? is the school distribution and out reach altered?
how different is this from the many NGO interventions in schooling?
LikeLike
Good topic to debate..one hand we have this dire need to offer basic education – if possible free or subisdised – in every tiny village in the state and on the other hand we have this massive,inept and inefficient edd dept of the government that is failing in its fundamental responsibility to provide elementantary education to the children.
The govt handing over basic eduacation to private sector – however good, efficient and honest the private players are – amounts to abject failure of the part of the govt in its duties to the citizens and washing away its basic responsibilities. The education minister – who takes offence and suspends teachers for not inviting him to school functions – must explain his actions to the people.
As TS rightly asks…i am wondering what the move really entails..
LikeLike
Pingback: Privatizing primary education at Blogbharti
Tarle/Andy, I’m pasting the report below — from Star of Mysore’s online edition dated March 30. Perhaps KP didn’t publish a link ‘cos the SOM site doesn’t archive beyond six days.
What gets my goat: (1) this important decision was taken without discussion in the assembly, (2) an elected government seems eager to shirk its responsibility toward not one or two but ~50,000 schools, and (3) precedent — the Infosys Foundation may offer to manage the justice system; Ratan Tata Trust may ask for the Indian Army!
(From their track records they might actually do a better job! — but that’s not the point.)
Initially I thought SOM might have pulled a rare April Fool prank. But KP forwarded to me a report in today’s Hindu where Sri. Lakshmi Chand Jain and Dr. URA have reacted. Apparently the decision is for real. (http://www.hindu.com/2007/04/01/stories/2007040105810600.htm).
Best,
Nikhil
50,000 GOVT. SCHOOLS TO BE HANDED OVER TO PREMJI FOUNDATION
Bangalore, Mar. 30 (KMS& NMG)- The State Government, which is planning to ban arrack and lottery in the State, is preparing to sacrifice the Government Kannada schools to make up for the financial loss.
It has prepared documents to hand over 50,000 Government schools to Premji Foundation of Azim Premji, Chairman of WIPRO, from the present academic year, it is learnt.
Premji, who has consented to the offer of the Government in a written agreement, is said to have put forward some conditions.
The Government schools which were established by the kings of the State for the benefit and development of rural and poor students are in a pathetic condition now. These schools will come under the control of Premji from June 1 this year and will be managed by his enterprise WIPRO. All the Government schools which has classes from one to ten will be managed by WIPRO and the employees of Primary and Higher Education Department will become its employees in every sense.
The Government is also learnt to have agreed to part with the Centre’s Rs. 1,500 crore annual grant for the schools to Premji Foundation along with all the benefits from the State Government.
During the tenure of S.M. Krishna, the Government had entered into an agreement with Premji Foundation to provide mid-day meals and to develop Government schools in the Hyderabad-Karnataka region, which has been productive.
LikeLike
with the right checks and balances…I see nothing wrong
LikeLike
it is the most bogus news item in recent times. i wonder how the correspondent concocted it. most appropriate for the Fool’s Day but was published two days earlier!
LikeLike
It is these kind of people who neither help nor stand back when people like Premji foundation try to do something, who do maximum harm. Democracy and debate in this country has meant paralysis and inaction…look at the parlous state of our schools…If ANYBODY does take some interest, they shuld be welcomed instead of all the time their motives being questioned…
LikeLike
Hmm.. may be some wonderful business ethics would be taught to kids!!
LikeLike
ದಡ್ಡರ ದಿನಾಚರಣೆಗೆ ಸೂಕ್ತವಾದ ಸುದ್ದಿ. ಕೀಪಿಟಪ್!
LikeLike
Imagine the potential increase in turnover of 2 of group cos…lighting and peripherals ( lights are needed for the schools and PCs would be introduced to schools) also imagine if there is a need for a s/w to maintain the data abt the schools across karantaka ( a la Bhoomi )… the potential is immense and also how abt the real estate value of these schools in case they want to rent out constructed shops / sheds ….
LikeLike
Point taken emailxyz..Wipro or anyther private company’s help and inititaive is appreciated and is most welcome..
debate is being called about state govt’s bankrupt administration which is unable to manage basic education for children…one has to discuss if Wipro or anybody else is involved what will be their role etc..Govt can take help from private players but cannot run away from its constitutional obligation. Thats the sad issue
LikeLike
Vinay, Clash – Really fine observations
cheers
LikeLike
This is indeed terrible news if it were true – a total abdication of responsiblity- scarier still is the thot that just checks and balances ( for such irresponsible authorities !?) can make it look alrite to some people at least.
LikeLike
Ah! Narayana Murthy one week, Azim Premji the next. Sweet.
LikeLike
good intervention nikhil. i hope people here read newspapers as carefully as you do. interestingly neither the government nor the premji foundation has reacted to the issue.
LikeLike
“All the Government schools which has classes from one to ten will be managed by WIPRO and the employees of Primary and Higher Education Department will become its employees in every sense.”
That is helpful information. But even with that, what exactly is Wipro’s mandate is unclear.
What is an institution? There is only a service for which, hopefully, public funds are used to deliver at a particular price and quality level and has certain outreach. As things stand, that service (education) is neither uniform nor is it universal solely due to administrative reasons. (population explosion has nothing to do with it)
Between the neighbourhood conment, and the assorted paaThad meshtru, primary education itself is already privatized. Nobody with reasonable means and access will even send their kids to gov’t schools. Forget nostalgic alumni, intellectuals, education department employees and other assorted institution builders. (Prof. Nissar Ahmed eloquently talks about this on the sampada.net podcast)
If WIPRO can do something to sharpen management and administration, can parity in quality be achieved? Can this actually make gov’t schools deliver the service that they are meant to? If gov’t schools achieve quality, will this show that the private school emperor is himself naked and perk them up to tailor better service?
Could divesting administration allow Gov’t to concentrate on content management, oversight?
LikeLike
http://aksharafoundation.org/
LikeLike
Nikhil, The Hindu article talks about “The proposal to set up the State Institute of Educational Management and Training (SIEMAT) in Karnataka in partnership with Azim Premji Foundation”.
How is this ‘handing over’ 50,000 schools? One has to be insane to even think about taking over such a large network of schools plagued with all sorts of problems.
LikeLike
We have lived with private schools for a very long time. These private schools mushroomed precisely because the government could not provide education in enough quantity or quality. I don’t see this decision as anything different from “privatisation” of primary education in our state. This could be one of the best things to happen to our state’s education system.
I am a bit confused (as are some others here) as to the problem Nikhil sees in this. The lack of a democratic debate or a process? Stretching the argument, shouldn’t we have a debate every time a private trust or foundation applies to open a private school or a college?
As for the public institutions Nikhil mentions in the US, many many school districts hand over management of the schools to private contractors. The school boards keep themselves busy with figuring out what to teach in those schools. As for the army, the use of private “contractors” in Iraq is a source of much debate in the media here. Many prisons are built and operated by private companies. So are many of the DMV (like our RTO) offices where the testing of drivers and issuing of licenses is farmed out.
With the evidence, I see nothing wrong with the Azim Premji foundation “taking over” 50,000 or however many schools in Karnataka.
What would be criminal on the part of the government however is if it gave up its right of oversight too. There is no evidence that this has happened.
LikeLike
I Completely agree with G3rdst .How many of the people send their Kids to Government schools? I recently heard that Government is doing a lot for the schools and investing a lot. The salaried of the teachers have increased substantially . Did anyone know that a High School teacher earns close to 15K+ per month .
This I am telling because my In-law is a government School headmaster in Mysore and also proudly state that his school has been a Model school now for many years .
If Wipro is adapting these schools to raise their quality that has to be appreciated .
On a different note ..Nirmala Souchalaya adapted lots of public toilets maintained them for a fee in order to keep it clean . We dont lament that the basic amenity that has to be provided by government has been given to a private operator . Whats wrong with that?
LikeLike
I am a bit confused (as are some others here) as to the problem Nikhil sees in this. The lack of a democratic debate or a process? Stretching the argument, shouldn’t we have a debate every time a private trust or foundation applies to open a private school or a college?
Gokulam,
Actually, the argument above is tangential. It is not a debate on whether private schools should exist or not but is a debate on the lack of process.
I agree with Nikhil.
1. The turning over of a public institution over to a private one, albeit for the right reasons, without a public debate. over dutiies, checks and balances, appraisals, progress, goals, measurement/metrics etc.
2. The abdication of one of the main duties for which a govt exists in the first place, viz education.
3. The arbitrarines of policy makers is being questioned by Nikhil. What if ITC wanted to run health clinics in Bengal? Wouldn’t this arbitrary decision by Karnataka set a precedent? Would you have called for a debate if ITC or Ganesh Beedi had requested to do the same?
There is nothing wrong in a private company being asked to provide services. Nikhil, as far as I could make out, is not debating that point at all. He is merely questioning the lack of due process.
LikeLike
DG,
I recently heard that Government is doing a lot for the schools and investing a lot. The salaried of the teachers have increased substantially . Did anyone know that a High School teacher earns close to 15K+ per month .
I have recently read reports, seen pictures and spoken to friends who volunteer with non-profits. There are schools in most parts of Karnataka, including tribal schools, in which, teachers earn Rs. 1000/- per month. Where classes are held in one room shacks, where mid-day meals are served (if lucky or not served (if a remote village). Where there may be 2 teachers for 100 students in one village, while another may have 1 teacher for 3 students. Where some students in 2nd grade are married (yes in Karnataka). Where teachers aren’t evaluated on any basis. Where drop out rates aren’t measured. Where there are no metrics to measure pass/fail rates, and the success of schools. Where students have no concept of vocational guidance and go into college to do BA or drop out since they do not know anything about education. Where 1st grade students actually cry because a “nicely dressed” person from a city actually spoke to them decently.
The state of education in “progressive” states like Karnataka ( leave alone states like Bihar or Orissa.) can bring tears into one’s eyes. See some of the Karnataka based projects that the org that I often volunteer for.
LikeLike
Hi everyone,
I am completely aghast at the decision of the government to hand over 50,000 schools to the Azim Premji Foundation. I do agree that the foundation will being to the table its expertise but not without costs.
1) I am intrigued how this decision is going to affect freedom in schools. Putting it in a nutshell, how comfortable the foundation will be addressing issues of social justice such as including students from all castes. This also ties up with positive discrimination or affirmative action or what we simply know as reservation in our country. Wipro and other corporates have consistently opposed the policy of reservation. How will this stand get rearticulated in their taking over of the schools.
2) The foundation believes in a certain kind of education where students are made computer literate and the focus is on providing them skills needed to get jobs rather than developing critical citizenship. How will this play out in our government schools? Considering that we are already a sell out to the open market ideology, how will this arrangement help breed students who will prove to be a captive labour force tommorrow rather than self-reflecting citizens?
3) In those schools that the foundation manages, the communities are expected to take over after sometime or at least equitably manage the centres. This is an alibi for saying that communities should part with some money to run the centres. How will this affect the taking over of schools? Until now, education, however miserable, was free in government schools. But I am sure that after sometime, the foundation will introduce the logic that the community will have to pay for the service “so it can be bettered.” I have deep problems with this. And there is an urban arrogance attached with this stand. Someone once commented that villagers have money to celebrate festivals but not to manage their schools. Who is to decide that community funds have to go into “this” rather than “that”?
Any answers???
LikeLike
Quizman,
Thanks for the clarification. Nevertheless, I fail to understand the need for a big debate just because it is 50,000 instead of 1. The government abdicated the responsibility of education the moment it allowed private players to open schools and colleges. Their number is probably higher than 50,000 by now. The debate on oversight probably happened a long time ago, and the very same checks and balances that apply to those private institutions would apply here.
While the decision is unexpected, I don’t think it is arbitrary. Neither party could have come to this decision without a long conversation. And I don’t think ITC or Ganesh Beedies are a good example. Those are for-profit corporates whereas the Azim Premji foundation is not. Not that I would mind those people running clinics in any case with the right checks and balances.
More broadly, I don’t think there should be any “holy cows” for the government alone to own. We all have seen security companies protecting us when the police cannot. If the police didn’t “abdicate” its responsibility, we wouldn’t need them. If the municipalities didn’t “abdicate” garbage clearance we didn’t need mohalla and street associations that pooled money to get the streets cleaned.
If we accept that tasks should be assigned to resources with the greatest expertise, then government should stick to policy making and oversight alone.
LikeLike
Gokulam,
If we accept that tasks should be assigned to resources with the greatest expertise, then government should stick to policy making and oversight alone.
No one is disputing the role of private organizations vs public ones. It is merely the lack of transperancy and accountability that makes one lament. With regard to Ganesh Beedis and ITC, I was referring to any non-profit wing of these companies.
By extension, if the SIMI or Shiv Sena were to launch a non-profit and run schools, I would be very worried. Thus, there has to be a due process to handover public institutions carefully.
LikeLike
[Off Topic] Do any of you know which is that great school in Mysore that has mandated laptop for every student from I to X standards!? :O
LikeLike