CHETAN KRISHNASWAMY writes from Bangalore: Sparks of cinematic brilliance crackle in isolated bursts all through Vishal Bharadwaj’s densely textured film Kaminey. Unfortunately, a rather dysfunctional script makes it stutter and stammer, much like its protagonist Guddu, and is ultimately unable to convey anything coherent to a bewildered audience.
The entire string of good and bad people in the film are after a guitar case, which carries a Rs 10 crore haul of cocaine. This includes two estranged brothers, Charlie and Guddu, superbly enacted by Shahid Kapoor.
Emotionally devastated by their father’s suicide as kids, the brothers embrace different paths. While the unscrupulous Charlie pulls his stunts in the race course, Guddu, who works for an NGO, fantasizes a corporate life, even as he constantly rummages his hovel in search of a condom to make love to his randy girlfriend Sweety Bhope, played to perfection by Priyanka Chopra.
Guddu’s ambitions come to a grinding halt, when he realizes that a pregnant Sweety is the sister of a fanatical thug, who loathes the non-Maratha interlopers who have come into Bombay and appropriated what rightfully belongs to locals like him. That Guddu originally hails from Uttar Pradesh doesn’t help him either. Bhope’s sole aim is to get this upstart out of his sister’s life.
Charlie’s villainous propensities lead him to a hotel room where he subjects a double-crossing jockey to third degree methods to retrieve the lakh that he has lost in a bet.
A chain of events in the hotel room lead to Charlie escaping with the cocaine stash in the guitar box. From somewhere here, Bhardwaj loses his grip, and like a severed plastic-kite buffeted by unruly winds, the film goes awry, until the gun-fire smothered climax decisively tears it asunder .
Like the famed Langdaa Tyaagi in Omkaara, Bhardwaj crafts his characters masterfully, endowing commonplace quirks and attributes that make them stand out in the unimpressive pantheon of Bollywood caricatures. But the rich characterization alone fails to hold sway and save the disastrous film.
Reinforcing Bharadwaj’s creative sensibilities is the film’s musical score. Exceptional and completely unusual, it pounds into you, drawing you into the vortex of a searing, pulsating rhythm. Gulzar’s colloquial lyrics add to the magic.
However, Bhardwaj cannot be brushed away as a “faltering filmmaker” or “as the most overrated director of the nineties”. His stylistic embellishments and ability to inject novelty and anticipation into the most humdrum of scenes is a talent that is rare: almost reminiscent in grandeur of the legendary Gabbar scene in Sholay. There is evidence of this in certain sequences in Kaminey.
Bhardwaj, like Anurag Kashyap, belongs to that radical new crop of filmmakers who specialize in what I would call the ‘shock & awe’ genre. The audience is instinctively repulsed by the many stark facets of this brand of intelligent, layered film-making , but eventually relates to it. The trappings of commercial cinema actually making them more palatable than the contrived arty-types.
Probably, there is an element of self-obsession in these films, but which piece of creative work isn’t? Distinctiveness is the hallmark of all great works. But Kaminey by no means is a great work. Moreover, the non-linear, kaleidoscopic narrative, at times swathed in dull, fading monochrome, makes Kaminey a difficult film to watch.
Kaminey falls flat on its face but Vishal Bharadwaj needn’t worry: his credentials are intact.
Also read: Thank god, one critic thinks Kaminey is crap
Kamal Hassan: Conceited, egotistical, narcissistic. The greatest?
i dunno why Ck is schoked by it. everything else has been shown and done. what remains is making cheap remakes of national geography channel. that or genuine look into the human dimension. and VB, AK, Bellary, selva, cheran et all are doing just that.
I would think so would majority of kannada film makers. since they cant beat kodambakkam and banjra hills and ghatkopar in terms of $$$, they should reinvent themselves and bring out multi billion $$$ characters, ala gururaj and bhatta. people like rangayana raghu, umashri are putties waiting to be modeled. instead our people are chasing unmentionable stiff necks of gandhinagar.
**
if i have to be cryptic, once ramayana was written one tye of stories were done. then somebody else had to write a mahabharatha to better it. that ofcourse is the mother of all stories. what are you going to write to write to better mahabharatha? you cant write much. so, you deliberately move away from episodic stories like mahabharatha and get to stories about the goings on between the episodes.
LikeLike
It is not ‘Shock & Awe’ genre, but I call it as RGV Genre. In fact it is more popular as RGV Genre.
Yes, the stupid film maker who once given superb films like Shiva, KshnaKshnam(Telugu), Rangeela and the Trilogy – Satya, Company and Contract.
Don’t know when he will get his lost magic touch.
LikeLike
Why is Churumuri.com turning in to a filmy review site???
LikeLike
BTW what on earth is the meaning of ‘ almost reminiscent’- Sounds like partly pregnant- The movie is as bomabstic as this writeup-
The only good thing is thank God for Gulzar.
LikeLike
Not a film that will be appreciated by “Normal” people like CK!, Definitely not a film for the masses- Basically not your “normal” film. Requires a slightly cynical psychotic mindset to interpret this one. A certain Quentin Tarantino is the father, uncle and cousin of this genre and so you need to know/like Tarantino to view this in any perspective.
LikeLike
Bhope’s sole aim is to get this upstart out of his sister’s life.
Are you sure that you saw the movie? :D
LikeLike
While I agree with a majority of what CR says, the following paras, sans explanations of actual instances where these are at play just seem like a fanboy speak.
Rather than the 6 paras to explain the movie plot, I would have loved if Chetan had explained the above two as to why he deems VB worthy of the media extol..
LikeLike
I don’t think that Kaminey has fallen flat on it’s face. It’s good film if not great, decent in it’s presentation and well carried by actors.
Critics can say that this was not there, there was a problem, this thing should have been better. They say can n number of things.
But what matter most or make a film great is the response from the viewers, how the viewers are receiving it and taking forward.
You make a great art film with all great cinematic greatness in it, which generally don’t catch the peoples pulse. But you can never deny the same status (great film status) to a commercial film which don’t the art greatness in it, but has got the pulse of the people with it.
Critics like CK should come out of the cube that they have built thinking that art directors are the best, they should rather also have a look from the direction of the people who watch it.
LikeLike
Sweety Bhope…Randy? CMon she is just crazily in love~
It’s a film that grips you for the two hours that you watch it…take home a few bits of conversation about the movie and then forget all about it. it’s not an Omkara or a Satya that haunts you long after its gone.
LikeLike
Responding to Madhu Rao: On certain scenes remniscent of Gabbar: I was referring to the scene at Guddu’s shack where his inebriated accomplice (from the Bengali gang) recklessly takes on Bhope. Suspense is gradually built into the scene: They liberally trade insults, playfully point guns at each other, all along keeping up the non-stop banter, until Bhope shoots him in a split second. The Sholay scene echoes in the mind.
By ‘shock and awe’ – I meant the raw manner in which certain scenes are portrayed in these films, could be the condom scene, where Sweety talks about how it heightens the distance between the two…there are certain dialogues all through which shock you or make you distinctly uncomfortable…it could even be Bhope’s very parochial but basic observation of how locals are deprived of their benefits by migrants… there is a deliberate attempt to jolt the audience in these films and that was what I meant
Intelligent, layered film making: you can see that in the narrative style and handling of certain scenes….
LikeLike
@Chetan,
Thanks for clarifying ; was unsure where you were coming from on those two paras. Now that you explain, it does make sense. I do concurr with you for most parts. I do feel Kashyap has it in him to bring us good movies and like you mention this was average at best and no Satya or Omkara. I smiled when I read “..dull, fading monochrome, makes Kaminey a difficult film to watch..”. It was the most annoying part :-)
LikeLike
The banter at Guddu’s shack was actually the most annoying part. It was contrived, over-the-top and very filmy.
The way the banter was going on , one could have easily have anticipated that one of the characters would be shot dead any moment.
I found that predictable. Therefore, not intelligent. Inference: Quite unimaginative.
Chetan found that intelligent and layered. So he hails the director.
What makes Kaminey a difficult film to watch is not just the dull fading monochrome, but that it demands you to be hyper-attentive all the time.
Come on, you go to a movie to relax, and leisurely soak in what is unfurling on the screen. I am sure none of us like to strain our every brain cell to comprehend the bewildering, non-linear narrative style.
The most enjoyable films are those that are :
The simplest yet clever.
The simplest, yet touches a chord in you.
Like Khosla ka Ghosla.
Where you don’t have to look at the person sitting next to you and wonder if he is as bewildered as you. In concentraing more on the technique and narrative style rather than the story itself, Vishal Bhardwaj has done himself a big dis-favour.
Anybody who found the film as unappealing is branded non-intelligent.
So be it.
I am dumb.
LikeLike
What is more important in making a film?
Techinique of story telling?
Or the story itself?
In Kaminey, all the attention is drawn by the ambivalent, shimmering costume of a technique, overshadowing the inner beauty a la story.
LikeLike
Correct me if wrong- You really loved “Hum aapke hain kaun” and “vivaah” right?
LikeLike
Who me?
Crap.
I am not into such sugary mindless films like vivah.
LikeLike
Once in a while getting bewildered and watching movies which stimulate your brain cells is good for a viewer’s intellectual development rather than watching the same genre of movies our Bollywood produces which touches all parts of the body except brains.
LikeLike
Just watched Eda kallu Guddada mele on DVD- behind that facade of bad cosmetics and cinematography was real stuff. Not pretentious like Kaminey or sugary like Vivah or gory like Gajini- but the power to shock and the violence was gut wrenching.
That my friends Chetan to Simple to MGR is a film for grown ups ( A la Virginia Woolf and Middlemarch). Kaminey in a long line of recent movies is banal.
LikeLike
Vinay
I am all for ‘intelligent’ movies, thoughtfully made or which stimulates your brain cells.
YMI (Yeh Mere India) is a movie which is certainly not run of the mill. No gyrating bombshells. No item numbers. No fourty year old men prancing aroound trees. No mushy cliched romantic dialogues, No hideously made up villians. No ‘hero’ taking on a dozen goondas.
It is very real and thought provoking. Although the director’s preachines and the sloppy execution of certain scenes gets to you sometimes. It is a film which exposes the naked underbelly of people’s prejudices. Regional Prejudice, Religion prejudice, Class Prejudice, Caste Prejudices, Nationality Prejudices, Sexual Prejudices and what not.
The story of Kaminey is very very basic. Nothing profoundly intelligent or insightful about it. What is allegedly intelligent is the treatment. Gibberish can’t be passed off as intelligence.
Gaby Sir
I agree with what you say. Edakallu Guddada mele may lack finesse or sytlised treatment, but at the core it has a very meaty story. If Vishal Bhardwaj had directed Edakallu Guddada mele, his overtly self-conscious, ritzy treament would only distract from the essential goodness of the film and spoil the story.
In the words of a great filmmaker “Embelishements should enchance the story not distract from it”.
My mom used to make alugadde palya the typical Karnataka way. With masala, chillies and the works. I hated it.
Years ago, when I was in Dubai, I ordered a steak for myself in some fancy restaurant. Along with the steak, came a peripheral dish which was quite simply baked potato, with a pinch of salt. I just loved it.
It was only then that I realised that too many unwanted ingredients that my mom used in her alugadde palya was killing the original flavour of alugadde.
Kaminey is a bit like my mom’s alugadde palya. Too many masala techniques, which kills the original flavour of the story.
LikeLike
wait a minute gaby are you talking of this filim?
in ths advancing age i cant remember the details, and dont remember if the entire movie was shot in with this consistency, but this one is a keeper.
btw such a gurly thing to say gaby. my head would split into a billion pieces watching such deep filims. anyway i have a theory, basically the type of filims like are highly correlated with the type of haraTe people like to do at their jagalis & kaTTes. gurls talk one type of issues, boys other. gurls are fixated with details boys with trends, gurls with connections, boys with transactions (beka kharchige) and so on…
LikeLike
oh! come on simpelore!! you are being simplistic. and something about the director is just bothering you and you are not saying it.
comon its legitimate that different makers have different takes on the same events. what you are saying is everybody should paint in a similar way for example from the same perspective, because you like mashed potatoes more than aaloogaDDe palya, bcoz your mother made it. (that story of yours is very telling, gaby here will be able to dissect the psychology involved in it better than me, but as they say these parts, you have issues doode.)
you and (gaby) also find “intelligence”(whatever it means) only in “messages” and “stories”. what you are saying is there is no intelligence involved in perceiving mundane regular events. and if a story has only mundane events then it is not interesting or intelligent. when somebody says akki aarisuvaaga chikka nunchina oLage bangaaravillada beraLu, or writes about the mundane travails of the raaya who mistimes his visit to his missus’ tavaru are all style & unintelligent because they make no political, sociological statement. wah!! kya baat hayy!!
LikeLike
Guess this is the first time I heard someone berate their Mom’s cooking!
LikeLike
Sorry TS I dont find ‘ intelligence’ ( yeah whatever that means!) in messages and stories- but in ‘ intelligent ‘ things. If you can put style into it you saw ‘ wow’ . It doesnt even have to have a vague character involved such as a newly married bride or an inattentive man who doesnt know when his wife has her periods.
Even a mostly impersonal ‘ homabale hoovinali horata parimaladalli uyyale ninna hesaru’ is beautiful, has style and makes sense!
As far as analysing Simplejeee’s alugadde palya aversion I can only surmise he doesnt like the way his mother cooked alugadde palya as a central dish- he likes it as a peripheral one- go figure that!
LikeLike
@Simple,
You do not like the Karnataka style alugadde palya ? The one that’s staple in masale dose ? It’s probably the best simple dish — green chillies, a hint of ginger, coriander and oggarane with sauteed onions. What not to like ? :-)
@Gaby,
Whoa, whoa ! If you read what I wrote, I said I disliked Kaminey but feel Bharadwaj is among the better directors of today. Best of the worst. I am in no way including him in the same bracket as Puttanna Kanagal. How can you compare his work to Kanagal’s ?
But as compared to a Farah Khan, Karan Johar, Adi Chopra and the new crop that seem to have been lost in a fancy world of melodrama and fluff, he has potential, like what was evident in parts in Omkara. Omkara is not even my all time favorite. It was just one of the good ones of last decade. a decade that was mostly filled with crap like Main Hoon Na, K3G et al..
Eda kallu … is my favorite too. Along with Arth, Saaransh, Maasoom, Teen Deewarein, Pallavi Anupallavi, Aandhi, Naagarahaavu, Samskara…
LikeLike
Madhu Rao
I loved all the films you listed from Arth to Saaransh to Masoom to Samskara. Nothing snazzy about them. They were all simple, yet memorable tales told in an engrossing manner, and touched your heart. Yes, Puttana Kanagal is one of my all time favourite directors.
As far as Farah Khan, Adi Chopra and Karan Johar are concerned, let us not berate them for their creative limits. They make films purely for entertainment AND ALSO FOR dumbing down the collective intelligence of our country, in the bargain making sacks of moolah for themselves.
THeir films are not engaging entertainment, it is forget-in-a-hurry-entertainment.
And no, I don’t like alugadde palya the karnataka style. Hello, guys? Do i have the right to like or dislike any dish? Is this culinary fascism, that i should like the dish that you guys like? Or you will shove the food of your choice down my throat?
Gaby Sir
I got confused with your central and peripheral vocabulary. Alugadde palya is never a central dish in any cuisine. It always comes with a dosa.
Vittan Potli
Yea, mine was a candid admission, and i am sure i have a right to dislike dishes made by my mom, without making me out to be a monster.
Are you one of those guys who squeals “Oh, my mom is the best cook in the world”?
Tsubba
Ouch, that was needlessy nasty. Why am i being hauled up for merely stating that i did not like the alugadde palya of my mom? Take it at its face value and don’t drag psychological games into an innocuous statement of mine.
I loved several other hundred dishes my mom made. From Stuffed Capsicum to Kadbu To Badnekayi Pachdi.
So what do you make of that?
Silly.
It’s simple really
LikeLike
sorry. the context in which it was written gave a different meaning in my mind. which is out of context here. mannisa beku.
the type of movies people are listing and the reasons for it, i think people essentially want to really see drama elaborated by the possibilities of a camera. what i am saying is camera allows many other possibilities and it would be criminal if somebody does not exploit it and just sticks to story.
my fav example is this:
anybody who has dreamt should please think how it is that our dreams playout. in this particular scene what is important, IMHO, is the relationship to time. when events playout in waking state they are a function of time, which atleast i, when i close my eyes and replay the events, have always imagined to proceed from left to right. but after the first time i saw this film, i realized in my dreams all events happen instantaneously within one “frame”, even when i get up and realize that there was a lot of “story” told in that dream. cinema of course cant capture all that, but this comes close to it. and this is only possible bcoz you can actually make time go down and up in cinema. how are you going to show this in drama? heLi? there is nothing simple about this scene it is elaborately staged and full of jingchak. but it is just about as simple as it needs to be without being simplistic.
before giving another example, in contrast to this consider ghatashraaddha. prolly bcoz subbanna co-wrote it, the story is incredibly sensitive and highly textured. but if you see just see the frames the young kasarvalli captured the story in, and dont know the context of the story, you will see what a let down that film was. almost none of the frames really stick. imho, the visualization was very tentative and i could only understand the importance of events because being a member of the evil middil aged, middil klass bremins family, i instinctively understand the orthodoxy. in contrast, chomana duDi supplements my own insticts and the visualization helps me connect despite my conditioning. but of course the former got a swarnakamala for “cinema”, when swarnakamala class cinema is this:
rays risks putting us through nausea to show it like this. just see how much jingchak is there. i dont know how he fixed the camera like that.
dont get me wrong. massive respect for k saar.
more later.
***
btw k saar is a real student of cinema. humble enough to organize a conference to study why mungaru male was success.
***
cinematic kasarvalli.
see the amount of jingchak in visualization. see how it adds to the drama. see the scaffolds and solid structures in the background? you think K saar picked them out just for looks?
***
btw the old man is shri vasudevaraayru aka choma
mother of all jingchaks… bhuter naach (bhootada kuNita) by ray-raayru.
LikeLike
Simpleji, even with your latest explanation, you still have problems dude! TS is right.
LikeLike
gaby this is how it starts.
i said: raaya who mistimes his visit to his missus’ tavaru
u said: an _inattentive man_ who doesnt know when his wife has her periods.
just by being themselves, men can become problematic for women. they dont even have to do anything malvolent.
forgot the sequence now, but i doubt if he was being inattentive. everyman knows the event can only be guesstimated and never be surely known. genuine honest mistiming only it may have been, especially since, being far away, he did not have the benefit of experiencing the ominous signs of the onset of the coming psychological tsunami.
padumaLu oLagilla, nakkaLu, raayaru nagalilla. rofl!!!!
oLamaneyali neeraaiythu endaLu naadini raagadali. awesome hang hing alla raagadali andiddu naadini. awesome!!
i think girish karnad’s life and work is perhaps the greatest celebration of kannaDa. aata muTTidella mangaLa. might not necessarily agree with his politics, but that is my politics. he has prolly done more for kannada than many others. even today, from seeding a whole lot of characters of aa dinagaLu to a rocker like raghu dixit. he will prolly go unheralded and under appreciated. award i dont care.
LikeLike
TSubba
For all your rather erudite knowledge about films, I think ‘Taste’ is very subjective.
Taste in food, clothes, dance, music, movies is all subjective.
You feel jinghchak technique adds value to the story.
I disagree
The examples you gave, i found it awfully pretentious and boring. You may think it is high art. I think it is high fart.
If a story is meaty, you don’t need jingchak technique, you need tecnhinques which enhance the story telling.
Technique is important only to the extent that it doesn’t distract from the core story, but it supplements the effort of story telling.
In any case, teh first film you have showed is more about techincal wizardy, rather than story telling!
LikeLike
i have seen this. will get back later.
but cinema is a technical field. it is more than drama. you are looking for drama. visualization is important.
it is also shallow. and extremely passive. if you want story, morals, and depth why dont you go sit and read a book? why do you want to see a filim.
taste is subjective depending on how tight you are wiling to hold on to your biases. for example certain genteel readers of this forum find aithe paithe tasteless. saying taste is subjective, in such cases amounts to saying nothing much at all. that just convenient escape hatch from where when all else fails you can go and hide in your shell.
talking of pretentious, how about pretentious stories like YMI. how can anybody tell a story with that huge list of litanies you mentioned? how different is it from saying 6 saangsu, 3 fighTu, mother sentimentu, sister sentimentu, foriegn locationsu etc etc…
any way later.
LikeLike
There is quite simply space for all kinds of films
Films which require technical jingchaks and quite clearly, films which don’t require any technical embellishments.
Technical wizardy can enhance story telling. Like in Lord of The Rings. Like in Matrix.
At the same time, you don’t need technical finesse at all like in the film Masoom. Yet it was an engrossing movie.
If Shekhar Kapoor had added jinghchak techniques to his movie Masoom, it would have destroyed the melancholic innocence of Jugal Hansraj, the searing guilt of Naseeruddin Shah, the ambivalent agony of Shabana Azmi
LikeLike
simpalore, will get back to you.
dont agree with you. the example you gave is, how to say this nicel, is wrong. maasoom is full of jingchak.
LikeLike
Shekhar Kapur himself has said that there is zero jinghaks in Masoom.
He has said many times, that while doing the film, he was so ignorant of film techniques, that it surprises him now that he actually made such a nice film in his very early days in filmdom.
Means?
Story telling should come from the heart. Simple, soulful, heart-touching ones always come from within.
Jinghchak techniques are laboured and trying hard to showcase their cleverness.
LikeLike
Totally agree with TS- Maasoom is overloaded with ‘ jingchak’. It still is a nice and watchable movie but a very laboured one with little spontaneity.
LikeLike