Across the world—from Britain to Israel, Chile to Bolivia, Hungary to Philippines—political analysts and academics are horrified at the powers elected leaders are accumulating under the cover of #COVID to detain people, close borders, shut down courts, surveil people, prevent assembly and so on.
Some of these steps are understandable in the circumstances, but many of the new powers have little to do with the outbreak.
In many nations, populist leaders have doused themselves in teflon, and convinced the people that their policies are beyond scrutiny and criticism; that the normal rules of politics do not apply at a time like this; that accountability and transparency need to be suspended for some indeterminate period.
In the name of “national interest”, of course.
As Anne Applebaum wrote in The Atlantic:
“The opposite is true: All of the decisions being made right now, whether medical or economic, deserve widespread scrutiny and debate. As Francis Fukuyama has written, there is no evidence that authoritarians are better than others at controlling disease; several democracies—South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, and perhaps Germany—look like they have control of their coronavirus outbreaks. Nor does any evidence show that secrecy produces better outcomes; quite the contrary.”
The twist being this:
After six years of untrammelled exercise of authority, Narendradas Damodardas Modi suddenly appears to have discovered ever so slightly that there may be, just may be, some virtue in what little democracy is still left in the country.
# In the last 15 days, the prime minister has addressed the country 5 times: on March 19 (when he imposed a #JanataCurfew); March 22 (when he announced #ThaaliBajao); March 24 (when he announced a 21-day “lockdown”); March 29 (Manni ki Baat); and April 3 (to ask people to light lamps).
# In the last 15 days, the prime minister has had “interactions” via video with representatives of industry; representatives of electronic media; representatives of print media; with radio jockeys, and with “eminent sportspersons”.
# In the last 15 days, he has had “interactions” via video with chief ministers of states; with SAARC leaders; with leaders of the G-20 countries; with heads of Indian missions broad; with members of his own ministry.
# And, in the last 15 days, the honourable Member of Parliament from the Lok Sabha constituency of Varanasi had an “interaction” with his constituents, again by video. And, in addition, addressed BJP workers by video on the party’s 40th anniversary.
The uncharitable way of looking at these “interactions” is to see them merely as photo-opportunities grabbed by a publicity-hungry, image-conscious leader starved of his oxygen by the advertised benefits of “social distancing”.
The official photographs of these “interactions” back this somewhat, for it is Modi who is mostly doing the talking and gesticulating in them whereas it should have struck him by now that he has spoken more than enough and needs to listen a lot more.
But that would be quibbling.
The point to ponder, therefore, is whether Modi—after announcing the life-crushing #Demonetisation, and the abrogation of Article 370, and the CAA/NPR/NRC without any consultation—has suddenly realised the value of taking everyone on board.
Today’s Deccan Chronicle broaches this point in an excellent editorial: “Meet PM Narendra Modi, suddenly a consensus builder”
There are other signals in the last few days which suggest that Narendra Modi has seized the opportunity offered by #CoronaVirus to take a different tack, if not craft for himself a new not-the autocrat, not-the-authoritarian persona.
Suddenly, The Supreme Leader who had been strutting all over as if he knew it all and done it all, and who didn’t brook the thought of anybody else possessing any wisdom, is reaching out to all and sundry.
Suddenly, CMs are being advised to charter their own timeframe to lift the 21-day lockdown, in imposing which they had no freedom.
Suddenly, IAS officers who had been emasculated wholesale, are finding the nerve to leak their feedback to the PMO that the “lockdown” should be extended.
Perhaps, a puny pathogen can bring the most powerful to their knees.
Perhaps, an intimation of mortality can puncture puffed-up egos.
Perhaps, it is best to corporatise the profits and socialise the losses.
Perhaps, democracy has its uses after all.
Perhaps, this too is a put-on.
Screenshots: courtesy The Telegraph, PMO, Deccan Chronicle
It could also hint at why the other fellow has remained in the background all these days. Or, it could be a complete power struggle right at the top. Either ways, it means that ultimately there will be a lot of muscle-flexing to prove his worthiness. At the moment he is out of his depths and he knows it. I suspect he is also very, very frightened of a backlash, hence the nautankis to thaali-bajaao/diya-jalao.
My gut feeling is that it will pretty much be true if this continues till May and get worse after the economic meltdown that is likely to appear starkly after July. Fudging of figures of fatalities might ultimately prove his undoing.
Of course it’s a put on. He needs CMs behind him and hence this great show of consulting them knowing full well that, like him, they have no idea what to do now except extend the blockade.its like that sham of the consultation with owners not editors of newspapers.
The ever smug and comfortable upper classes are of course behind modi as always and even those not so well off have been gulled into believing this draconian lockdown is the only option. Only those really suffering who will never be consulted will demand that the govt come up with something more imaginative.